<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disappointing news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hohndel.org/communitymatters/ming/disappointing-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hohndel.org/communitymatters/ming/disappointing-news/</link>
	<description>open source, technology, high tech toys and the communities around them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 01:18:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel® Software Network Blogs &#187; Moblin at OSCON</title>
		<link>http://www.hohndel.org/communitymatters/ming/disappointing-news/comment-page-1/#comment-5811</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel® Software Network Blogs &#187; Moblin at OSCON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hohndel.org/communitymatters/?p=136#comment-5811</guid>
		<description>[...] The topic was Moblin - or more specifically, the Moblin.org open source project and our goal to get a larger and larger open source developer community together that will drive the direction of the open source software stack used on internet focused devices. Lots of &quot;open source&quot; in that last sentence. And that&#039;s intentional. There are many projects that try to create open source or Linux based stacks for mobile devices. But none of them have really convinced me that they are truly open source. Openmoko may be an exception - but as I wrote a couple of months ago progress there has been slow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The topic was Moblin &#8211; or more specifically, the Moblin.org open source project and our goal to get a larger and larger open source developer community together that will drive the direction of the open source software stack used on internet focused devices. Lots of &#8220;open source&#8221; in that last sentence. And that&#8217;s intentional. There are many projects that try to create open source or Linux based stacks for mobile devices. But none of them have really convinced me that they are truly open source. Openmoko may be an exception &#8211; but as I wrote a couple of months ago progress there has been slow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moblin at OSCON &#124; Community Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.hohndel.org/communitymatters/ming/disappointing-news/comment-page-1/#comment-5808</link>
		<dc:creator>Moblin at OSCON &#124; Community Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hohndel.org/communitymatters/?p=136#comment-5808</guid>
		<description>[...] The topic was Moblin - or more specifically, the Moblin.org open source project and our goal to get a larger and larger open source developer community together that will drive the direction of the open source software stack used on internet focused devices. Lots of &#8220;open source&#8221; in that last sentence. And that&#8217;s intentional. There are many projects that try to create open source or Linux based stacks for mobile devices. But none of them have really convinced me that they are truly open source. Openmoko may be an exception - but as I wrote a couple of months ago progress there has been slow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The topic was Moblin &#8211; or more specifically, the Moblin.org open source project and our goal to get a larger and larger open source developer community together that will drive the direction of the open source software stack used on internet focused devices. Lots of &#8220;open source&#8221; in that last sentence. And that&#8217;s intentional. There are many projects that try to create open source or Linux based stacks for mobile devices. But none of them have really convinced me that they are truly open source. Openmoko may be an exception &#8211; but as I wrote a couple of months ago progress there has been slow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrey</title>
		<link>http://www.hohndel.org/communitymatters/ming/disappointing-news/comment-page-1/#comment-3469</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 22:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hohndel.org/communitymatters/?p=136#comment-3469</guid>
		<description>What else do you want..? A real substitution for the privative brand-original software? What else... seriously... Those are open source minded projects which are intended to be a real alternative. Mission impossible, considering that those others ones have thousands fully qualified, fully paid programmers working on that. Just compare.


Glad to hear of yours again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What else do you want..? A real substitution for the privative brand-original software? What else&#8230; seriously&#8230; Those are open source minded projects which are intended to be a real alternative. Mission impossible, considering that those others ones have thousands fully qualified, fully paid programmers working on that. Just compare.</p>
<p>Glad to hear of yours again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

